W. R. Sorley’s Review on Esquisse d’une morale sans obligation ni sanction by Jean-Marie Guyau
Mind, Vol. 10, No. 38 (Apr., 1885), pp. 276-281. This is an interesting and valuable essay towards the establishment of Lire la suite
Mind, Vol. 10, No. 38 (Apr., 1885), pp. 276-281. This is an interesting and valuable essay towards the establishment of Lire la suite
The purpose of this book can best be stated in the words of the author’s opening paragraph. It is “to
(Review) by F. W. Coker of « Philosophy and the Social Problem » by Will Durant. Lire la suite »
This very readable and interesting book contains two perfectly distinct ideas, either one of which might be accepted by a
(Review) by C. E. Ayres of « Philosophy and the Social Problem » by Will Durant. Lire la suite »
The ethical theory on which the argument of this book is based is that virtue is intelligence because intelligence gives
(Review) by H. W. Wright of « Philosophy and the Social Problem » by Will Durant. Lire la suite »
German author and intellectual Thomas Mann had a profound impact on the literary and intellectual landscape of the 20th century.
Henry Sidgwick’s Review Mind, Vol. 4, No. 16 (Oct., 1879), pp. 582-587. Guyau’s work is an enlarged edition of the first part of an essay on “La Morale Utilitaire,” to which a prize was awarded in 1874 by the Académie des Sciences Morales et Politiques. His view of Epicureanism is not, in the main, quite so novel as the reporter of the Académie seems to have supposed; but his book may be cordially recommended to students of ancient philosophy as containing not only the most ample and appreciative, but also—in spite of some errors and exaggerations—the most careful and
W. R. Sorley’s Review on Esquisse d’une Morale sans Obligation ni Sanction by Jean-Marie Guyau. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, T. 19 (janvier à juin 1885), pp. 319-328. This is an interesting and valuable essay towards the establishment of a “scientific” ethics. The author, who is already favourably known for what he has done in recording the history of ethics, has now set himself to make material for that history.[1] He does not, indeed, break absolutely new ground, for Spencer, Simcox, Stephen and Höffding are among his predecessors. Yet he has ideas of his own, both
(Review) Jean-Marie Guyau, Esquisse d’une morale sans obligation ni sanction Lire la suite »
Wilbur Marshall Urban’s Review[1] Perhaps the most melancholy phase of the storm and stress through which the English-speaking peoples have been passing is the Nietzsche horror which seems to have taken possession of them body and soul. It was not so long ago that Mr. Gilbert Chesterton, with that finality which so easily besets him, told us that the ‘superman’ makes any discussion absurd into which he enters, and most of us were well pleased with this sign of robust English sense. We were told that art is the last refuge of the overman and, never having taken art
Lane Cooper, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Jul., 1911), pp. 443-444. This volume, the first in the series
(Review) George Santayana, Three Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante, and Goethe. Lire la suite »
R. Adamson, Mind, Vol. 8, No. 31 (Jul., 1883), pp. 432-438. The difficult task undertaken by Professor Caird has been